Sometimes I feel that the 'Indian secular
industry' must be acknowledged as the eighth wonder of the world because of its
inexplicable logics. When International Yoga Day was celebrated in 177
countries including Muslim countries which follow Shariat laws, Indian secular
industry defined Yoga as a Hindu practice which can't be imposed on Indian
Muslims. To explain further they said that both Om and Surya Namaskar are
anti-Muslim. Om in fact is considered as a sacred sound, mostly meaning an
affirmation or acknowledgement. In some cases it's defined as 'Atman' and'
inner soul of self'.
Not going into details, it can be said that
people also bear their name as 'Om'. Thus calling a particular person by his
name Om (for example Om Prakash) is not imposition of Hindu practice but using
it in Yoga becomes communal. Similarly what does 'Surya Namaskar' mean? On
translation in Islamic terms it means 'Salaam to the Sun'. However the Indian
secular industry termed it as one of the worshipping rituals of Hindus.
The above expression of mine is a personal
observation on how Indian secular industry tries to play divisive role in
alienating the Indian minority community from the majority community, stoking
wrong interpretations just for petty vote bank politics. But this time they
have gone beyond limits justifying even terror. UP cabinet minister Azam Khan
described the Paris attack as a reaction to an action, where as Mani Shankar
Aiyar justified the Paris terror attack saying that the western countries must
end Islam-phobia.
What it means? Aren't both playing obnoxiously
to the gallery of Indian Muslims, provoking them to take up arms in case they
feel that they are being discriminated? Aren't indirectly they justifying all
the terrorist acts inside as well as outside India? Both Mani Shankar Aiyar and
Azam Khan are habitual offenders. Aiyar was earlier too involved in commenting
over the Charlie Hebdo terror act, citing it as a backlash by the Muslim
community.
Indian Muslims totally reject terror acts, be it
from ISIS or from any other organization. Notable Muslim scholars' time and
again have appeared in press and TV studios reiterating that Islam is a
religion of peace and it doesn't endorse terrorism of any kind. India is
home to around 18 crore Muslims, but are the least radicalized community
compared to other nations. There are some radical youths who have joined different
terror groups, but then such radical/fringe thinking can be found across all
religions and communities. No religion or community endorses such fringe
elements.
Since 1947 both Hindu and Muslim communities
have clashed with each other in several riots (all are in fact due to political
conspiracies) yet both communities took ample steps not to radicalize their
youth. That's why India has
a special status in the world.
Mani Shankar Aiyar and Azam Khan should refrain
from behaving like fringe elements that exist in both communities, because one
of them is a former union minister and another is a present cabinet minister of
largest state of India.
So, should they be featuring on the same page as
Owaisi, Sakshi Maharaj, Yogi Adityanath, Sadhvi Prachi, or Akbaruddin? Will the
Congress and Samajwadi Party take action against them or simply ignore it
by just distancing themselves from their comments in the name of self defined
secularism? If yes, then on what ground can they question the BJP for the
outrageous remarks of their motor mouth fringe mindset leaders?
No comments:
Post a Comment